Adoption Of Digital Gold Savings Schemes Among Millennials And Gen Z Investors

Authors

  • SHREEVALLI K.M CMS BUSINESS SCHOOL Author
  • RAVICHANDRAN KRISHNAMOORTHY Professor Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19842325

Abstract

This study examines the adoption of digital gold savings schemes among Millennial and Generation Z investors in India, with a focus on three theoretically grounded determinants: perceived usefulness, trust and security, and social influence. Employing a quantitative, descriptive-cum-explanatory research design, primary data were collected from 143 respondents using a structured, closed-ended questionnaire. Analytical techniques included descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Pearson correlation analysis, multiple linear regression, independent-samples t-test, and one-way Welch ANOVA. Results indicate a moderate overall adoption level (M = 3.06, SD = 0.583 on a five-point Likert scale). Trust/security (β = 0.196, p = .016) and social influence (β = 0.230, p = .005) emerged as statistically significant positive predictors of adoption, whereas perceived usefulness did not attain significance (β = 0.066, p = .412). The regression model was statistically significant overall [F(3, 139) = 5.19, p = .002, R² = 0.101]. No significant generational cohort difference (t = 0.301, p = .764) or income-group difference (F = 1.07, p = .381) in adoption was detected. The findings suggest that confidence in platform integrity and peer or social-media-driven legitimacy are stronger adoption drivers than functional utility alone. Theoretical and managerial implications for fintech providers, wealth-technology firms, and policymakers are discussed.

Author Biography

  • RAVICHANDRAN KRISHNAMOORTHY, Professor

    Faculty of Management Studies

    CMS Business School, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University),

    Bangalore, India 

Downloads

Published

2026-05-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Adoption Of Digital Gold Savings Schemes Among Millennials And Gen Z Investors. (2026). International Academic Research Journal of Economics and Finance, 9(1), 162-177. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19842325